π₯
Codebase Health Analyzer
Self-assess your codebase health across 8 critical dimensions
How to use this analyzer
- Rate each statement from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)
- Review your scores by category and overall health grade
- Follow the prioritized recommendations
- Re-assess periodically to track improvements
β¨
Code Quality
Code is readable and well-structured
Consistent coding standards followed
Low complexity (cyclomatic, cognitive)
Minimal code duplication
Proper error handling throughout
π§ͺ
Testing
High test coverage (>80%)
Unit tests for critical paths
Integration tests exist
Tests are maintainable
Tests run fast (<5 min)
π
Documentation
README is comprehensive
API documentation exists
Architecture documented
Code comments where needed
Onboarding docs available
ποΈ
Architecture
Clear separation of concerns
Scalable design patterns
Loose coupling, high cohesion
Database schema well-designed
Security by design
π¦
Dependencies
Dependencies are up to date
No known vulnerabilities
Minimal dependency count
Dependencies well-maintained
License compliance checked
β‘
Performance
Response times acceptable
Database queries optimized
Caching implemented
No memory leaks
Performance monitoring exists
π
Deployment
CI/CD pipeline exists
Automated deployments
Rollback capability
Environment parity
Infrastructure as code
π
Monitoring
Error tracking implemented
Performance monitoring
Logging is comprehensive
Alerts configured
Dashboards for key metrics
Overall Health
D
60%
β¨Code Quality
D (60%)π§ͺTesting
D (60%)πDocumentation
D (60%)ποΈArchitecture
D (60%)π¦Dependencies
D (60%)β‘Performance
D (60%)πDeployment
D (60%)πMonitoring
D (60%)Top Priorities
- β’ Improve Code Quality: Currently at 60% (Grade D)
- β’ Improve Testing: Currently at 60% (Grade D)
- β’ Improve Documentation: Currently at 60% (Grade D)
- β’ Improve Architecture: Currently at 60% (Grade D)
- β’ Improve Dependencies: Currently at 60% (Grade D)