Skip to main content
🎯

Incident Severity Classifier

Determine incident severity levels and appropriate response procedures

How to use this classifier

  1. Answer questions about the incident's impact
  2. Review the automatically determined severity level
  3. Follow the response procedures for that severity
  4. Use the communication plan and escalation path provided

User Impact

Business Impact

Technical Factors

Operational Factors

Severity Classification

🟑
SEV3
Medium

Functionality degraded for subset of users. Should be addressed same day.

Response Time
Within 2 hours

Response Team

  • β€’On-call Engineer
  • β€’Team Lead

Communication Plan

  1. Notify on-call engineer
  2. Create ticket or incident thread
  3. Update team in daily standup
  4. Notify affected customers if applicable
  5. Daily status updates

Escalation Path

0-2 hours: On-call engineer
2-4 hours: Team Lead
4-8 hours: Engineering Manager
EOD: Review if not resolved

Immediate Actions

  • β†’Begin investigation during business hours
  • β†’Review recent deployments
  • β†’Check monitoring and logs
  • β†’Implement fix in next deployment
  • β†’Add monitoring if gaps identified
  • β†’Update documentation
ℹ️
Postmortem Optional
Document lessons learned in ticket

Severity Level Reference

πŸ”΄
SEV1
Critical
Examples:
β€’ Complete service outage
β€’ Data loss or corruption
β€’ Security breach
β€’ All users unable to access core features
β€’ Payment processing completely down
🟠
SEV2
High
Examples:
β€’ Major feature not working for many users
β€’ Significant performance degradation
β€’ Revenue-generating feature impaired
β€’ Authentication issues affecting large percentage
β€’ Critical API endpoints failing
🟑
SEV3
Medium
Examples:
β€’ Feature degraded for subset of users
β€’ Non-critical functionality impaired
β€’ Workaround available but inconvenient
β€’ Minor performance issues
β€’ UI bugs affecting usability
βšͺ
SEV4
Low
Examples:
β€’ Cosmetic UI issues
β€’ Minor bugs with minimal impact
β€’ Edge case failures
β€’ Documentation errors
β€’ Non-urgent improvements